<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Objectifying Africa</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rabbibrant.com/2006/11/15/objectifying-africa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rabbibrant.com/2006/11/15/objectifying-africa/</link>
	<description>A Blog by Rabbi Brant Rosen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 19:18:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lesley Williams</title>
		<link>http://rabbibrant.com/2006/11/15/objectifying-africa/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lesley Williams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 20:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shalomrav.wordpress.com/2006/11/15/objectifying-africa/#comment-63</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My daughter&#039;s preschool did a unit on Africa last spring, largely because the teachers felt (rightly) that American children don&#039;t learn enough about the non-Western world. However, even this well-intentioned effort fell into the familiar condescending pattern.

Callie was taught that &quot;people in Africa are poor&quot; and &quot;people in Africa don&#039;t usually wear shoes&quot;. She learned an &quot;African&quot; folksong, but when I asked the teachers what language it was in they had no idea; it was simply &quot;African&quot;. Can you imagine lumping all French, Polish, Greek, Serbian and Danish cultures together as &quot;European&quot;, making no distinction between them?

I&#039;ve also noticed that when talking about Africa, there is a disproportionate focus on wildlife rather than human culture. Callie&#039;s workbooks, and our Dorling Kindersley encyclopedia both have many more pictures of African animals than African people.

Last week, when the Chinese government hosted a trade summit of African leaders in Beijing,  billboards featured elephants and giraffes roaming the savanna, and welcomed representatives from &quot;the land of myth and miracles&quot;. Perhaps the summit would have been more successful had the organizers recognized that Africa is also a land of human beings.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My daughter&#8217;s preschool did a unit on Africa last spring, largely because the teachers felt (rightly) that American children don&#8217;t learn enough about the non-Western world. However, even this well-intentioned effort fell into the familiar condescending pattern.</p>
<p>Callie was taught that &#8220;people in Africa are poor&#8221; and &#8220;people in Africa don&#8217;t usually wear shoes&#8221;. She learned an &#8220;African&#8221; folksong, but when I asked the teachers what language it was in they had no idea; it was simply &#8220;African&#8221;. Can you imagine lumping all French, Polish, Greek, Serbian and Danish cultures together as &#8220;European&#8221;, making no distinction between them?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also noticed that when talking about Africa, there is a disproportionate focus on wildlife rather than human culture. Callie&#8217;s workbooks, and our Dorling Kindersley encyclopedia both have many more pictures of African animals than African people.</p>
<p>Last week, when the Chinese government hosted a trade summit of African leaders in Beijing,  billboards featured elephants and giraffes roaming the savanna, and welcomed representatives from &#8220;the land of myth and miracles&#8221;. Perhaps the summit would have been more successful had the organizers recognized that Africa is also a land of human beings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

