Monthly Archives: December 2006

Parashat Vayigash 5767

akh.jpg“God called to Israel in a vision by night: ‘Jacob! Jacob!’ He answered, ‘Hineini.’

And (God) said, ‘I am God, the God of your father. Fear not to go down to Egypt, for I will make you there into a great nation. I Myself will go down with you to Egypt, and I Myself will also bring you back; and Joseph’s hands shall close your eyes.’” (Genesis 46:2-3)

When he was a young boy, God appeared to Jacob in the night with a message of reassurance and protection. (28:15) Now advanced in years, Jacob experiences a similar night vision as he prepares to travel to Egypt for a reunion with his long lost son Joseph.

It is understandable that Jacob would experience trepidation on the eve of this journey. After all, his father Isaac was specifically warned against going to Egypt by God during an earlier famine. (26:2) God’s words to Jacob are thus intended to reassure Jacob that he and his family will actually thrive and grow in Egypt (“I will make you there into a great nation”) and that he will be returned to his homeland for burial when he dies (“I Myself will bring you back; and Joseph’s hands shall close your eyes.”)

But at the same time, Jacob’s descent into Egypt represents something much greater. It is notable that he is referred to in this passage both as “Jacob” and by his newer name “Israel.” As Israel, Jacob is symbolic of an entire nation – and his journey to Egypt represents a role that the nation Israel now plays in a larger spiritual drama.

Indeed, God’s plan for Israel has been known to us from as far back as the Abraham narratives: “Know well that your offspring shall be strangers in a land not theirs; and they shall be enslaved and oppressed for four hundred years.” (15:13) Thus, Jacob’s journey into Egypt indicates more than just his reunion with Joseph; it is the necessary prequel to the Exodus story itself. Viewed in this regard, God’s promise to Jacob/Israel has a much more powerful symbolic resonance: “I will make you there into a great nation. I Myself will go down with you to Egypt, and I Myself will also bring you back…”

In some ways, Parashat Vayigash marks an important transition from the largely personal Genesis narratives to the collective national story embodied by Exodus. In so doing, Jacob/Israel’s descent into Egypt introduces themes and questions that have resonated from days of Exodus until our own time: why do we regard our oppression in Egypt to be a necessary aspect of our formation as a people? How has this experience informed our collective identity? How can we, like Jacob, face this often fearful journey with reassurance and hope?

JRC Construction Diary #4

img_2470.JPG

This past week the construction workers worked on the foundation walls of our new building. Specifically, this means they built wooden framing that served as molds for the concrete beams that sit on top of the caissons. A grade beam now runs the perimeter of the building and there is also one down each side of the center section of the building to support internal loads. Half of the grade beams have now been poured and the rest will be installed next week.

Above you can see a picture of the framing around the perimeter of the building. Below is a shot of the workers pouring the concrete for the grade beams.

The basic outline of our new building is now clearly visible! There was some rain this past week, but thankfully construction is still proceeding more or less according to schedule.

img_2486.JPG

Parashat Miketz 5767

photo1.jpg“And removing his signet ring from his hand, Pharoah put it on Joseph’s hand; and he had him dressed in robes of fine linen…” (Genesis 41:42)

The Joseph story is, among other things, a narrative with “sartorial significance.”

Indeed, references to Joseph’s special clothing abound: In last week’s portion we learned that his father Jacob dressed him in a beautiful multicolored coat (37:3). Similarly, when Pharoah first releases Joseph from prison, we read that Joseph “had his hair cut and changed his clothes” (41:14). Later, when Pharoah promotes Joseph to a place of prominence in his court, he dresses him in “robes of fine linen.”

Conversly, if the “dressing of Joseph” is symbolic of his good fortune, the stripping of his clothes parallels his travails. Last week we read that Joseph was stripped of his colored coat by his brothers before they throw him into the pit (37:23). In Egypt, after Potiphar’s wife makes sexual advances upon him, she grabs his garment and uses it as evidence to accuse falsely accuse him of attempted rape – a “crime” for which he is thrown into prison (39:12).

What are we to make of these multiple fashion statements? On one level, it is notable that Joseph is repeatedly “dressed and undressed” by others. In this sense, clothing might not represent his own personal sense of self, but rather a projection of external agendas and expectations – “artificial disguises” imposed upon him by family and society.

It is not until this week’s portion that Joseph understands how to use these disguises to his own benefit. When his brothers see him in Egypt after many years, we read, “they did not recognize him” (42:8), presumably because of his Egyptian style of dress. Subsequently, Joseph uses his new identity to put his brothers to the test, to see if they have truly learned from their past mistakes.

In next week’s portion, Joseph will throw off his disguise and reveal himself to his brothers. In so doing, he demonstrates his readiness to stand free of artifice and externally imposed identities. By “making himself known” (45:1), Joseph understands that the various robes he has worn up until until now are mere costumes – and that his true identity is as a conduit for a much larger purpose in the world. As he will say to his brothers in next week’s portion, “It was not you who sent me here, but God…” (45:8)

Joseph, in a sense, represents our own penchant for disguise – our willingness to let ourselves be dressed up in the symbolic “robes” that are placed upon us on the outside world. Taking our cue from this week’s portion, we would do well to ask ourselves: How are these identities forced upon us? What are the ways we buy into these disguises and use them to our own benefit? How might we find the means to throw them aside and discover the truer purpose that lies beneath?

Bah, Humbug…

judah.jpgAt the risk of coming off as Rabbi Grinch, I think it’s time you knew the real story of Hanukkah…

The brave heroes of our story, the Maccabees, came from a priestly dynasty known as the Hasmoneans. The leader of the Hasmoneans, Mattithias and his son Judah were what we might call today religious zealots. In 167 BCE they led a rebellion against the religious persecution of the Seleucid rulers in the land of Israel but they also fought bitterly against the assimilated, Hellenized Jews of their day.

You can read all about this in the Books of the Maccabees, which can be found in the Apocrypha – a collection of extra-Biblical writings that never quite made the final cut. After plowing your way through these exceedingly graphic and nasty accounts of of Jewish fratricide, forced circumcision and other bloody examples of Jew against Jew, you’ll understand why. (You’ll also understand why Mel Gibson was once interested in developing this material into a movie…)

While we are fond of telling the story of the Maccabean victory and their re-dedication of the Temple in Jerusalem, we don’t often tell the story of what happened to the independent Jewish state they established in the land of Israel afterwards. That’s because for the most part, the sequel to the Hanukkah story was a fairly ignoble chapter in the annals of Jewish history.

The Hasmonean dynasty eventually became fairly Hellenized itself. And when these priestly rulers weren’t persecuting the rabbinic Pharisees (our spiritual ancestors) they were busy killing one another and waging ill-advised wars of conquest against surrounding nations. In the end, it didn’t take long for the Romans to move in and mop up. All in all, the Hasmonean period of Jewish independence lasted less than one hundred years. So much for the second Jewish commonwealth.

Yes, boys and girls, that’s the real story of Hanukkah. Don’t worry, I haven’t Scrooged-out here completely – I’ll be lighting the Hanukkiah tonight just like you. But maybe, as we light our candles, we should take some time out to ponder how we might commemorate this complex legacy as 21st century American Jews.

In an article last year in Slate, Rabbi James Ponet considered this very question by asking “was the bloody Maccabean civil war and revolt necessary to the survival of Jewish identity?” Great question. If you could put your dreidel down for just a moment, I’d love for you to leave your own thoughts and comments.

Shandeh for the Goyim Pt. 1

920bb1b6-b200-4652-96ff-f4f894f88228.JPGUltra-orthodox Jews attending a Holocaust deniers conference in Iran? Yes, we’ve officially gone through the Jewish Lookingglass, folks. It’s a story only The Daily Show can cover properly – click here for their report…

Jimmy Carter Meets the Rabbis!

jimmycarter.jpgIn an effort to quell the brouhaha over his recent book, “Peace, Not Apartheid.” Jimmy Carter took time out of his book tour last week to meet with the Board of Rabbis of Greater Phoenix. My colleague Bonnie Koppell (a Reconstructionist rabbi and US Army military chaplain) actively participated in the meeting and reports that their meeting was quite substantive and complex.

The AP and other media outlets covered this meeting extensively, but Bonnie indicated they did a very poor job of conveying the substance of the conversation. For this reason, I won’t post any news links here. Instead, I encourage you to read Bonnie’s notes below, which are much more interesting than any of the media reports I’ve read on this story:

The impressions which stand out for me, in no particular order, are as follows:

1. President Carter was very proud of his work in establishing the US Holocaust Commission and referred specifically to Elie Wiesel. We replied with Wiesel’s quote, that the lesson of the Holocaust is that “you can get away with it.” We asked him as a student of the Bible and history, and in light of the recent events in Iran, to consider that if we have a sense of insecurity, it is well-founded. He seemed to somewhat appreciate this.

2. He invited us to come teach in his Sunday School class and we invited him to travel with us to visit Israel. We expressed a willingness to see sites through his eyes if he would do the same.

3. He expressed very strong support for Israel as a democracy while roundly condemning the actions of the Israeli government in the West Bank. We asked for and received a commitment from him that he would be more vocal in this regard on his book tour and we conveyed a strong sense that his admiration for Israel does not come through in his book.

4. He had no real answers when asked what are Israel’s legitimate security concerns.

5. He was also silent for a significant amount of time before replying when asked what happens to those in the Palestinian community who are perceived as cooperating with Israel. A member of our group helped him out with the answer: “They have the life-expectancy of a fruit fly.”

6. He promised to condemn Palestinian terrorism more loudly and clearly.

7. We presented him with a copy of the Siddur for Jewish military service members and bookmarked for him the Prayer for our Country, the Prayer for Israel, the Prayers for Home and Moral Strength, and the Prayer for the Journey. We concluded the meeting with prayer, holding hands in a circle.

8. There was a powerful plea for acknowledgement that the cycle of hated is perpetuated by the indoctrination of children as evidenced by prayerbooks in the West Bank community.

9. We did press him as to whether he might be an advocate on behalf of the return of the captured Israeli soldiers. He did not agree to do so. He indicated that he thought a fair offer had been made to exchange three hundred women and children held by Israel for those soldiers and that that offer had been rejected.

Notes from a follow up phone call with Rabbi Andrew Straus:

- He enjoyed meeting with us and learned from us.

- He will do a better job in future interviews of clarifying his use of the term “apartheid” and not using it in reference to the State of Israel, which he respects as a vibrant, thriving democracy.

- He will be more conscientious in denouncing Palestinian terrorism.

- When asked, “What is the Palestinians’ role in the lack of progress in peace negotiations?” he reportedly indicated that there wasn’t one. He does not see rocket attacks as impediments – and anyway they have stopped in the last few weeks.

- Finally, he agreed to write a letter to the Jewish community in some undefined format to express support of Israel as a democracy and to denounce Palestinian terrorism.

Parashat Vayeishev 5767

prisoner1.jpg“But even while he was there in prison, God was with Joseph.” (Genesis 39:20)

What does it mean that God was with Joseph in prison? While some might assume this is just a euphemism for Joseph’s good fortune, a closer look at the context of this story reveals a much more profound answer.

Joseph goes through many travails in this week’s portion and his incarceration represents, in a sense, his nadir. But prison is also the place of his transformation. In prison Joseph is transformed from the naive dreamer into the one who understands the inner meaning of dreams. (40:9-19) As a result of his imprisonment, he comes to understand that there is a larger purpose to his struggles and his pain. (41:16) Ironically enough, prison marks the beginning of Joseph’s eventual empowerment.

It’s not uncommon, of course, for prisoners to “find God” during their incarceration. History is replete with examples of individuals who underwent a significant spiritual transformation while in prison and its not too difficult to understand why. (Of course there’s also former NFL star Nate Newton, who lamented in one interview: “I didn’t find God in prison. All I found was hatred and the devil and dudes scheming up better ways to break the law…”)

Though many prisoners have found God to be a source of strength, prison can also be an unexpected teacher about the true meaning of liberation. Indeed, political Prisoners of Conscience such as Natan Sharansky and Nelson Mandela have written powerfully about how their imprisonment eventually became a means for their own inner empowerment. In Sharansky’s “Fear No Evil” he writes:

I decided it was best to treat my captors like the weather. A storm can cause you problems, and sometimes these problems can be humiliating, but a storm itself can’t humiliate you. Once I understood this, I realized nothing they did could humiliate me. I could only humiliate myself…

In honor of Parashat Vayeshev, why not act on behalf of current Prisoners of Conscience? Visit Amnesty International and learn how you can support Chinese internet activist Shi Tao, Eritrean journalist Fessahaye Yonhannes and four others who have been imprisoned solely for the peaceful expression of their beliefs.

Gays, Lesbians, and Conservative Judaism

glbt-magen.jpgThere’s been a great deal of discussion in the mainstream and Jewish press about the recent rulings by Conservative Judaism’s Committee of Law and Standards on the status of gay and lesbian Jews. (You can click here for a complete news report on the decision. If you’d like to wade through the various Rabbinical rulings in question, they are available on the Rabbinical Assembly’s website.)

The truly historic aspect of these rulings are represented by the following words, which come from the decision by Rabbis Elliot Dorff, Daniel Nevins and Avram Reiser:

This ruling effectively normalizes the status of gay and lesbian Jews in the Jewish community. Extending the 1992 CJLS consensus statement, gay and lesbian Jews are to be welcomed into our synagogues and other institutions as full members with no restrictions. Furthermore, gay or lesbian Jews who demonstrate the depth of Jewish commitment, knowledge, faith and desire to serve as rabbis, cantors and educators shall be welcomed to apply to our professional schools and associations.

In short, this means that three out of the four American Jewish denominations (Reform, Reconstructionist and now Conservative) now sanction the ordination of gay or lesbian rabbis as well as commitment cememonies between gay/lesbian partners. Those of us who have worked for GLBT inclusion and affirmation in Jewish life are profoundly gratified by this important new step. My own denomination, the Reconstructionist movement, has long led the charge in this regard (read here) and it is gratifying to see other movements now following suit. We can only hope these breakthroughs will have an impact upon American religious life beyond the Jewish community.

However, there is one other aspect of the Dorff/Nevins/Reiser opinion that has attracted some attention (or possibly caused some jaws to drop onto the floor):

The explicit Biblical ban on anal sex between men remains in effect. Gay men are instructed to refrain from anal sex.

In other words, the Conservative movement has voted to ordain gay rabbis and sanction gay commitment ceremonies, as long as gays (or at least gay men) refrain from having gay sex. (I know, I know, it must have been as strange for you to read these words as it felt for me to write them…)

Without going too far into the legal complexities of this issue, this prohibition comes from the verse in Leviticus 18:22: “Do not lie with a male as one lies with a woman: it is an abhorrence.” For a movement that views itself bound by halacha, or Jewish law, this particular Biblical prohibition presents a formidable challenge. The Dorff/Nevins/Reiser ruling thus represents a kind of legal middle ground. While the logic of this ruling might seem mystifying or even hypocritical to some, it is nevertheless an important step forward for a movement that views itself as bound by Jewish law and yet desires to be responsive to 21st century American life.

My Reconstructionist colleague Rabbi Amy Small (who serves Congregation Beth Hatikvah in Chatham, NJ) put it well recently on our Recon rabbinical listserve:

The decision is not what we’d want, but it is also not what many in the Conservative movement want. Given their internal struggles to both hold the movement together in a time of much internal division and their hope of remaining engaged in a halachic process, they may have moved as far as they could for the moment. That movement on this issue, however, is a significant directional shift. I applaud them for that and lend my support to those who will continue to work for change.

Another Recon colleague, Rabbi Mychal Copeland (who serves Stanford Hillel and belongs to a Conservative congregation) described the ruling as part of “the growing pains all denominations deal with at different moments in their evolution.” Mychal shared that she used to serve a congregation that struggled with her being a lesbian rabbi. She added, however:

The relationship progressed so well that when they decided to affiliate with the Conservative moment years later after I’d moved on, it was only under the condition that they could hire a GLBT rabbi if they so desired. That kind of change is how I see the recent ruling working on the ground. Gay rabbis have to be visible in order to change minds.

And at the end of the day, this is what the Conservative movement ruling will help to accomplish: the increasing visibility of gay rabbis and the increasing affirmation of gay Jews. Yes, perhaps it is only one small step. But for all the GLBT Jews who are currently wondering if there could ever be a place for them in the Jewish community, this small step might well make a world of difference.

Where do we go from here? Let’s dream a little. I’ll give the final word to my Recon colleague Rabbi Toba Spitzer (Congregation Dorshei Tzedek, Newton, MA):

I personally am looking forward to the time when all of this bizarre negative obsession with homosexuality by the hetero mainstream will be behind us and we can move on to solving problems like world hunger and war, instead of having to defend our basic humanity…

Parashat Vayishlach 5767

jacob-and-angel.jpg“Jacob was left alone. And a man wrestled with him until the break of dawn.” (Genesis 32:25)

Jacob sat alone on the edge of the riverbank, watching the water shimmer and sway in the moonlight. He could barely make out the forms crossing over to the far side. With each passing moment they disappeared from his gaze like inky bubbles popping against the dark horizon.

An uneasy lonesomeness came upon Jacob. It was a familiar sensation though he realized he hadn’t noticed it in many years. The last time he remembered feeling this alone was the night he ran away from home as a child. Shivering and fearful, he had camped out in the open wilderness using a rock for a pillow. After that terrifying night he vowed he would never allow himself to feel so vulnerable again.

Jacob awoke from that night with a resolve that surprised him in its ferocity. He went on to build a refuge in the sanctuary of his many wives and children, his servants and attendants, his vast holdings. At long last Jacob had found his strength. He had wrestled with an uncertain world and had prevailed.

Or so he thought until now. Now Jacob found himself alone once again, and the depth of his loneliness truly unnerved him. He smiled ruefully. Even in the midst of his noisy entourage, he had always been alone. During the struggle that had defined his life, he had never given himself the opportunity to face this unhappy truth. But now, on this moonlit riverbank, it bore down upon him with remarkable intensity.

Out of the corner of his eye, Jacob saw the shadow again. He twisted around sharply to catch it, but as always, there was nothing. The shadow was Jacob’s faithful travel companion. He had felt its presence ever since the day he left home as a child. It danced just beyond the range of his peripheral vision but always managed to disappear whenever he turned to confront it. Over the years, Jacob had grown used to its presence as one would tolerate a barely tolerable family member.

Suddenly, with a violent jolt Jacob was seized from behind. His breath burst from his body in one huge gust and he bent over gulping at the air. Just as suddenly he was grabbed around the middle, lifted high, and thrown back to the ground. Lying flat on his back, Jacob opened his eyes, but could see little. The moon had become obscured by clouds, transforming the night into one great shadow.

Jacob felt his strength beginning to return and he wrestled the man over. Together they rolled over and over down the slope of the riverbank until they splashed into the water. The sharp cold jabbed into Jacob like a blinding light. He blinked at its impact, as if he had been rudely, brutally awakened from a contented sleep. And memories long obscured by darkness came rushing back into daylight.

Jacob was a young boy once again, back in the land of his childhood. It was late afternoon and he was sitting under a tree, trembling with the knowing dread that his life had just been forever transformed. This time was different. This time he had gone too far.

As a child, Jacob had always loved to see how far he could push Esau, who had none of the cleverness of his younger brother. Toying with Esau was a kind of sport for Jacob, and it somehow helped to heal the hard truth that Esau was older, stronger, and the obvious favorite of their father.

But even Jacob hesitated when his mother came to him breathlessly that afternoon and instructed him to steal his brother’s blessing. He did it of course, because his mother’s love was the only real comfort in his life. And perhaps because he knew that in the end, outright theft was the only way he would ever receive a blessing of any sort from his father. But now, as he sat trembling against a tree watching Esau eagerly entering his father’s tent, he realized that this particular blessing would come to him at an almost unbearable cost.

Jacob and the shadow had been wrestling for what seemed like hours now, thrashing in the water like condemned men. For his part Jacob fought with the strength of one who was experiencing a moment of raw and desperate truth.

Jacob watched his older brother enter his father’s tent, food in hand, ready to finally receive his blessing. After a few long moments came a bitter and heartbreaking cry. “Don’t you have a blessing left for me? Bless me too father!”

The words tore into Jacob’s gut, astonishing in their power. Over and over again, Jacob listened to the awful words bursting out of the tent. “Please, bless me too, father!” Jacob’s trembling grew into spasms. He clutched his sides and rocked back and forth, begging for his brother’s cries to cease.

Those words, the ones Jacob had kept hidden away in the shadows for so many years, now returned to him as he wrestled in the night. He heard them distinctly, repeating over and over against the splashing of the dark water. “Please! Bless me too, father!” Then Jacob realized through his tears that it was not Esau’s voice he was hearing at all.

Again and again Jacob screamed at the night visitor, “Bless me too, father!” With each outburst he felt his strength return tenfold until he pinned his wrestling partner down against the riverbank. Jacob shook him like a limp rag doll. “I WILL NOT LET YOU GO UNTIL YOU BLESS ME!”

And from out of the darkness, a voice replied to him, “You are no longer the weak, frightened boy named Jacob. For now you have seized your blessing honestly, face to face. From now on your name shall be Israel, for you have wrestled with your shadows and have prevailed.”

As his night visitor rose to take his leave, he turned to face Jacob. In one brief, glancing moment, Jacob saw a number of faces gazing back at him. A father beaming with love and pride at long last. A mother telling him it was now safe to return home. And a brother smiling through his tears, finally ready to embrace him in forgiveness.

Jacob looked up and saw the sun rising over the mountains in the east. The night shadows had disappeared and he was alone once more. He stood up and looked out across the river, now shining in the morning light.

Slowly, painfully, he limped his way across the water.

JRC Construction Diary #3

construction-002.jpg

Cold weather construction: it’s no picnic.

Last week’s huge Midwest snowstorm was followed by frigid temperatures that lasted well into this week. Amazingly, amidst it all we only lost three total days of construction. The crew was back out on the site today, continuing to work on the foundation.

The temperature is supposed to warm up this weekend and the first shipment of steel is scheduled for next week. If all goes well the workers will install the rebar, which will provide reinforcement for the foundation. Hopefully it will be warm enough to pour the concrete foundation floor as well. Stay tuned.

Needless to say, I have new-found respect for Chicago construction workers…