Just saw “West Bank Story,” the 2007 Oscar winner for best live action short. Breathtakingly bad. A parody of “West Side Story” about competing Israeli and Palestinian falafel stands, the film is an unmitigated disaster: fifteen long minutes of horrible slapstick, unfunny songs and, most egregiously, infantile cliches that undercut its ostensible message of co-existence.
What struck me most while watching it was its glaring inauthenticity. Though it seems there were Israelis and Palestinians associated with this film, its humor is based largely in schticky Western stereotypes of both peoples – sort of like “Weird Al Yankovic Goes to the West Bank” (but not nearly as clever…)
Director Ari Sandel claims to have made this film with idealistic intent. Upon accepting his award, he said in his speech:
To be able to get this award just goes to show that there are so many people out there that support that notion that when it comes to a situation between Israelis and Palestinians hope is not hopeless.
If there is hope in this botch-job, I didn’t catch it. Quite the opposite, actually. In the film’s final line, the Israeli man tells his Palestinian lover that if their people can’t get along, he will take her to a place where “Jews and Muslims live in harmony: Beverly Hills.” On the surface it’s just a stupid punch line – but it contains an unintended resonance of cynicism. (Indeed, part of the tragedy of this conflict is precisely that moderates from both sides are emigrating and leaving the conflict to their respective extremes.)
So in the end, we have a fairly hopeless message from a totally clueless movie. How on earth did this drek manage to win the Academy Award?
For very obvious reasons, there aren’t an abundance of film comedies dealing with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, but for those who are interested in this sub-sub genre, I personally recommend “Divine Intervention” by the young Palestinian director Elia Suleiman.






Thanks to whoever out there nominated “Shalom Rav” for
In this week’s Torah portion, Tazria-Metzora, we learn, among other things, about a strange ailment that affects the stones of a dwelling, rendering it spiritually unfit for living (see Leviticus 1:34-53). The portion goes on to describe the extensive ritual by which the High Priest re-purifies the house.
The young man who killed 31 people at Virginia Tech was a paranoid delusional psychotic. But there is something equally sick about a society that allows such a person to walk into a gun shop and buy two deadly firearms as easily as he would a candy bar.
And now for some serious kvelling from a proud Dad…
Shema
What Would You Do?
Oy vey.
Why did Nadav and Avihu meet such an ignoble end? Though some commentators assume their fiery demise represented Divine punishment, a close reading of these verses indicates otherwise.
Collective Guilt, Collective Atonement
Published April 27, 2007 Current Events , Darfur , Genocide , Holocaust , Human Rights , Judaism , Religion , Religion/Politics , Spirituality , Torah Commentary 3 CommentsThe concept of collective guilt is central to this week’s Torah portion, Acharei Mot-Kedoshim. The parasha powerfully teaches that communities, just like individuals, are able to bear guilt. And just as with individuals, this guilt cannot be allowed to remain in the collective soul – it must be faced honestly by the nation if it is to be successfully expiated.
The issue of collective guilt was on the front pages this past Tuesday as the world observed Armenian Genocide Remembrance Day. Those who attended the official observance here in the US might have noticed that there was a careful avoidance of the use of the word “genocide.” As a recent Chicago Tribune article explained:
A JTA article noted that the Jewish community has become increasingly “caught in the middle” of this high profile controversy:
It is surprising and, quite frankly, shocking that a prominent American Jewish leader (and Holocaust survivor) such as Foxman would counsel that Jews and Americans should not mix in on this issue. Jews should not hold countries accountable for committing genocide? If not us, who?
Here is the historical record: between 1915 and 1918, the Ottoman Turkish government subjected the Armenian people to widespread deportation, expropriation, abduction, torture, massacre, and starvation. The Armenian population was forcibly removed from Armenia and Anatolia to Syria, where the vast majority was sent into the desert to die of thirst and hunger. In addition, significant numbers of Armenians – including many women and children – were methodically massacred throughout the Ottoman Empire.
In 1915 (thirty-three years before the UN Genocide Convention was adopted) Turkey’s treatment of Armenians was condemned by the international community as a crime against humanity. Indeed, the very word “genocide” was coined by Raphael Lemkin, a human rights lawyer and activist (and Holocaust survivor) who viewed these Turkish atrocities as a clear precedent to the Nazi genocide.
Even in the face of compelling historical evidence and comprehensive eyewitness testimony, Turkey has resolutely refused to recognize its collective guilt. Using arguments that have the same alarming resonance as Holocaust denial, Turkey has claimed that the number of Armenians killed is vastly exaggerated, that those targeted were enemies of the state, and that most died from disease and starvation during their “relocations.”
Why are many American politicians and Jewish leaders hesitant to hold Turkey accountable? The answer has nothing to do with history and everything to do with politics. Turkey is, of course, a crucial NATO ally and offers the US open access to their Incirlik air base, an important transit point for nearly three-quarters of all military cargo headed for Iraq. Turkey is also a critical Western transit-point for Western oil interests. US companies have a significant stake in the continuing construction of an oil pipeline running from Azerbaijan to the Turkish port of Ceyhan. (Indeed, Turkey is not above politically retaliating against those countries that raise the Armenian genocide issue. In 2000, the House of Representatives withdrew a resolution on the Armenian Genocide after Turkey threatened to close its airbases to US planes on fly-over missions in Iraq.)
Notwithstanding Abe Foxman’s politically motivated remarks, Jews and Americans have a critically important voice to add in “arbiting” the resolution of this issue. Though Turkey may be a political ally of Israel, there is a deeper, countervailing value that is demanded of the Jewish people here. As Jews, we have experienced the collective trauma of genocide first-hand, and as such we have an added responsibility to shine the brightest light possible on all those who would perpetrate similar crimes against humanity. We, of all people, cannot ignore the Hitler’s tragically prophetic statement: “Who now remembers the Armenians?”
As Americans and citizens of what some people choose to call the “world’s only superpower,” we have a unique responsibility as well. Samantha Powers’ important book “A Problem From Hell: America and the Age of Genocide” has documented a our nation’s shameful inaction when confronted with the moral challenge of genocide. In the first chapter, she chronicles America’s nonresponse to growing reports of Turkish atrocities. Powers poignantly presents the pleas of Henry Morgenthau Sr., then the US Ambassador to the Ottoman Empire, as he helplessly witnessed the plight of the Armenian people (“It is difficult for me to restrain myself from doing something to stop this attempt to exterminate a race…”) Powers then goes on to demonstrate America’s repeated choice of political “strategic” expediency over moral leadership:
It’s time for us to break the pattern of nonresponse. Click here for more information about how you can urge your senators and representatives to call for swift passage of the Armenian Genocide Resolution (SR 106, HR 106) and take concrete steps to stop the ongoing genocide in Darfur.