Monthly Archives: July 2007

Unholy War

crusades1.jpgAs the book of Numbers comes to a close this week, we read an account of an Israelite military campaign that can only be described as holy war:

Moses spoke to the militia saying, “Let troops be picked out from among you for a campaign, and let them fall upon Midian to wreak the Eternal’s vengeance on Midian. You shall dispatch on the campaign a thousand from every one of the tribes of Israel.”

…They took the field against Midian, as the Eternal had commanded Moses, and slew every male. Along with other victims, they slew the kings of Midian, Evi, Rekem, Zur, Hur, and Reba, the five kings of Midian. They also put Balaam, son of Beor to the sword.

The Israelites took the women captive and other dependants of the Midianites captive, and seized as booty all their beasts, all their herds, and all their wealth. And they destroyed by fire all the towns in which they were settled, and their encampments. (Numbers 31:3-10)

What on earth do we make of a text such as this? Some commentators say that this account is not about war per se as much as it is a polemic against idolatry. Others point to the obviously dubious historicity of this particular text. Still others suggest that God’s commandments to destroy ancient nations such as Midian have long been rendered null and void since these nations no longer exist.

Though these kinds of explanations might be of exegetical interest, alas, they do not ultimately address the core moral problem of this text: namely, God’s commandment that Israel exterminate another people. At the end of the day, there can be no whitewashing of this fact, no re-rendering of the text that will somehow erase the profoundly troubling truth that such attitudes are part of our inherited spiritual tradition.

What do we make of a texts such as these? One thing we cannot do is wish them away. If we are to take our Torah tradition seriously, we must be willing to face it head on and to admit that there are certain voices in Torah that we might sometimes find morally difficult, troubling, or, yes, even repugnant. If we consider ourselves to be serious Jews, we owe it to ourselves and to our tradition to honestly own the all of Torah.

If we are able to do this, we will invariably find that the Torah truly is a mosaic of very different and often contradictory voices. (Serious students of Torah cannot fail to notice, for instance, that a very different portrayal of Midian is offered in the book of Exodus, where Moses finds refuge in Midian, marries a Midianite woman and seeks serious counsel from his father-in-law Jethro, the Midanite High Priest).

This phenomenon, of course, is not unique to Judaism. Ultimately, this is the central choice facing any religious individual: which are the voices in my tradition that I proudly affirm, and which are the voices that I disavow in no uncertain terms? Will I be ready to say without hesitation that there is nothing holy about fomenting fear and hatred of another people – and that there is no place for such ideas in my religious tradition?

In the end, there can be no equivocating on this point. In a world beset by growing violence in the name of God, the stakes of this choice are much too high.

Israel and the Arab League Pt. 2

shalomsaam.jpgOy.

As an addendum to my last post on this subject, read this short piece from today’s Ha’artez:

The foreign ministers of Egypt and Jordan will be coming to Israel on July 25 for the first time as representatives of the Arab League. Egypt’s Ahmed Aboul Gheit and Jordan’s Abdullah al-Khatib will present the Arab peace initiative to Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni. The two ministers had originally planned to come to Israel tomorrow, however Olmert asked them to postpone their visit because of his crowded schedule.

His crowded schedule??!!! 

So if we American Jews think the peace process should be higher on our government’s priority list, there is something we can do. Senate Resolution 224 is a critical bi-partisan resolution that calls for active US engagement to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Introduced by Senators Dianne Feinstein (CA) and Richard Lugar (IN), along with seven other original co-sponsors, SR 224 calls on President Bush to make a two-state solution a “top priority,” urges him to appoint a Special Envoy for Middle East Peace, and welcomes the Arab League Peace Initiative. It eloquently represents the pro-peace, pro-Israel positions shared by the vast majority of American Jews.

There are indications that this bill may actually be passed this week! If you haven’t yet, I urge you to ask your Senators to sign-on to SR 224 asap.  Click here for more info.

A Leader for a Multifaith World

images.jpgLatest on my lists of blogs you must add to your roll is “Leadership for a Multifaith World,” edited by Rabbi Nancy Fuchs Kreimer, Director of the Religious Studies Department at the Reconstructionist Rabbinical College. This important new blog was created through a Luce Foundation Grant to help the RRC develop effective new models for training rabbinical students to engage with people of other faiths. As Nancy correctly observes:

For most of Jewish history, it was not considered important or even desirable for rabbis to study religions other than Judaism. Today, it is indispensible. Despite the time consuming demands upon RRC students to master the languages and literature of the Jewish people, there has been an institutional commitment and matching student interest in exploring interfaith education.

I proudly wear my bias when I say that my alma mater, RRC, is on the forefront of training rabbis for the brave new multifaith 21st century world - and Nancy has been one of my/our important teachers in this regard. ”Leadership” promises to be valuable resource for future rabbis, but the blog’s mission also makes it clear that it seeks to promote multifaith ideas that will be of serious interest to the religious world at large.

(And while you are persusing “Leadership,” I also recommend Nancy’s wonderful books as well her personal blog, Midlife Musar, which is devoted her interfaith work, but also includes occasional ”travel, recipes, movie reviews or other quirky indulgences.”)

Israel and the Arab League

arab-league.jpgIn what I would call extremely welcome news, the JTA reported today that the Arab League will be making an official visit to Israel for the first time in history this week:

This week’s delegation, to be led by Egyptian and Jordanian officials, will discuss the threat posed by Hamas and Islamic extremism as well as the 22-nation league’s peace proposal. The plan offers full Arab recognition of Israel in exchange for its full withdrawal from lands captured in the 1967 Six-Day War, repatriation of Palestinian refugees and the creation of a Palestinian state.

“This is the first time the Arab League is coming to Israel,” Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesman Mark Regev said, according to The Associated Press. “From its inception, the Arab League has been hostile to Israel. It will be the first time we’ll be flying the Arab League flag.”

The growing power of Islamic extremists in the Middle East, underscored by Hamas’ violent takeover of Gaza last month, has drawn the fortunes of Israel and the league’s members closer together. 

My two cents? I’ve long felt that the Arab League’s peace proposal has been unwisely ignored by Israel and US for far too long (it was originally proposed back in 2002). At its core it promotes basically what other similar two-state plans have advocated: a Palestinian state established in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, Israel’s return to pre-1967 borders, the notion of a shared Jerusalem, and a mutually acceptable resolution of the refugee issue.

Recent events in Gaza seem to be offering new life to the peace process, and we can only hope that the US will finally step up to the plate to help broker these efforts. There seem to be some indications that this is so. MJ Rosenberg, of the Israel Policy Forum reported last month:

Washington is buzzing with reports that the Secretary of State is determined to salvage the “two-state” policy that President Bush announced five years ago Sunday. Word is that top State Department staffers, including the Secretary, are burning the midnight oil in what would be a last ditch attempt to acheive an Israeli-Palestinian agreement by 2009.

Let us fervently hope that renewed diplomacy is indeed on the way. The window of opportunity on a two-state solution is closing fast…

(For an intelligent Jewish consideration of the Arab League peace proposal, I recommend this analysis from Brit Tzedek v’Shalom.)

Broken Peace

broken-vav-num25-12.gifAt the end of last week’s Torah portion, Pinchas, son of Eleazar, son of Aaron, displayed his “zeal” for God by killing an Israelite man and a Midianite woman who were engaged in a public act of sexual idolatry:

When Pinchas, son of Eleazar, son of Aaron the priest, saw this, he left the assembly and, taking a spear in his hand, he followed the Israelite into the chamber and stabbed both of them, the Israelite and the woman, through the belly. (Numbers 25:7-8)

Pinchas’ act is portrayed in the Torah as an act of salvation for the Israelites. As a result of his initiative, a plague afflicting the people is checked – and at the beginning of our portion, God tells Moses that Pinchas’ action has saved the Israelite nation entirely:

“Pinchas, son of Eleazar, son of Aaron has turned back my wrath from the Israelites by displaying among them his passion for Me, so that I did not wipe out the Israelite people in My passion. Say, therefore, ‘I grant him My pact of peace. It shall be for him and his descendants after him a pact of priesthood for all time, because he took impassioned action for his God, thus making expiation for the Israelites.’” (Numbers 25:10-13)

It is important to note that Jewish commentators have long been troubled by Pinchas’ actions, as well as the suggestion that he seems to be rewarded by God for his zealousness. Many have suggested that God’s offer of a “pact of peace” (“Brit Shalom”) should not be regarded so much as Pinchas’ reward, but rather as a covenant that will require responsibility and moderation on the part of this future Israelite leader.

One of the most powerful commentaries on Pinchas’ act is written into the very fabric of Torah itself. The Masoretes – the 8th and 9th century rabbinic sages who codified the written Torah into the version we know today – instructed that the word “Shalom” in the term “Brit Shalom” should be written with a broken letter vav. As a result, every Torah scroll now bears this inner message: peace achieved through zealotry and violence is an incomplete peace – a “broken peace,” as it were.

For an era beset by growing violence committed in “the name of God,” this one small pen-stroke makes a profound statement indeed…

On Eagles Wings

eagle.jpgI’m writing this post from the north woods of Wisconsin, where a few hours ago I was treated to the majestic sight of an eagle landing in a tall pine tree just yards away from where I was enjoying my morning coffee. (Not a bad way to begin Independence Day!) There’s something truly breathtaking about these particular animals – when you see them it’s not difficult to understand why eagles have such deep symbolic importance for so many different cultures and spiritual traditions.

In the Torah, of course, the eagle is a central symbol of liberation:

You have seen what I did to the Egyptians, how I bore you on eagles wings and brought you to Me. (Exodus 19:4)

Commentators have pointed out that the image of the Israelites being borne out of Egypt on eagles wings is actually “zoologically correct:” eagles are indeed known for carrying their young on the wide expanse of their wings.

What a great spiritual suggestion for this 4th of July: perhaps true liberation can only come to our nation when we become as eagles for one another – committed to bearing all members of our national community upon our collectively outstretched wings.

Just a thought as you watch the fireworks and fire up the barbecue:

Happy Inter-dependence Day…