Monthly Archives: August 2007

Jerusalem Above

jerusalem_oldcity_1280.jpg

“You shall be established through righteousness. you shall be safe from oppression, and shall have no fear from ruin, and it shall not some near you…” (Isaiah 54:14)

These words, which come from this week’s Torah portion, Re’eh, evoke a collective dream of our life in the land – a life of blessing, of freedom, of ultimate safety and security. I’ve been especially mindful of this dream for the past ten days as I’ve been traveled throughout Israel with members of my congregation, many of whom are visiting and experiencing this land for the very first time.

Of course, it is impossible to be unmoved by the land’s palpable spiritual beauty – but it is just as clear, as many on our tour have observed, that the history of this region is marked by 3000 years of continous conquest and reconquest.  Yes, I agree: it is deeply ironic that the place referred to as the Holy Land has known its share of unholy inhumanity and tragedy. I’m writing these words from Jerusalem, the “City of Peace” that has known never truly known any peace.  How can we possible reconcile our ongoing dreams with such tragic history (and ongoing reality?) 

Here’s an answer from classical Jewish tradition: for their part, the rabbis spoke of two Jerusalems: Yerushalayim Shel Mata (“Jerusalem Below”) and Yerushalyim Shel Mala (“Jerusalem Above”). Earthly Jerusalem is the physical city we know which, while beautiful to be sure, is but a pale reflection of Heavenly Jerusalem – the Jerusalem of our highest aspirations, the true City of Peace.  As I choose to understand this sacred symbolism, it teaches that if Jerusalem below does not yet resemble Jerusalem above, it is only because we have not yet managed to make it so.

To help underscore this point, I’ve posted this picture of Jerusalem taken via satellite to suggest what the city might look like from Yerushalyim Shel Mala.  Isn’t it amazing how things always look so much simpler when viewed from above?

May all who consider this place to be holy realize this collective dream. May earthly Jerusalem be a true City of Peace, established in righteousness, safe from oppression, free of fear from ruin…

A View from the Golan

picture-027.jpg

That’s me (left) and JRC’s cantor Howard Friedland posing against the Upper Galilee on Mitzpe Gadot, on the Golan Heights. We spent the day today largely touring the Golan – when we weren’t sampling the local beer and wine, we learned a great deal about the history of this region and spent some time in conversation with a resident of Katzrin, the “capital city” of the Golan Heights.

As expected, her presentation was fairly hard-core, describing her own story (she came to the Golan just two years after it was conquered by Israel in the Six Day War). though she offered extensive military, political, and economic arguments for why this region should never be given back to Syria in a potential peace agreement, I found most of these rationales to be relatively tepid: the military/security reality is very different now, and this region is of negligible economic benefit to Israel. When all was said and done, her most compelling argument for retaining the Golan was simply that it was home for her and 18,000 other Jewish residents.

The participants of the tour had an interesting post-mortem discussion afterwards and we were lucky to have a tour guide that was willing to express his own candid opinions as well. While it is certainly true that the issue of the Golan doesn’t get nearly as much press abroad as the Occupied Territories, it has long been the source of highly politicized debate within Israel (see for instance, this article from Ha’aretz from last February).

For my part, as I listened to the impassioned words of the Katzrin resident this morning, I could certainly sympathize with the trauma of the potential dislocation. But at the same time, I couldn’t help but think that this region was settled with the express purpose of creating “facts on the ground,” by new residents who knew full well that this area would continue to be disputed territory between Israel and Syria and a possible bargaining chip in a potential future peace deal.

I’m also very mindful of the larger geo-political implications of a possible peace deal with Syria – and how far it might go in stabilizing an increasingly unstable the Middle East. Can we trust Syria to be a true partner? Readers of this blog will already predict my answer to that one: we won’t know unless we try. In the meantime, are we willing to let 18,000 residents (less than half the capacity of Wrigley Field) keep us from finding out?

And that, my friends, is my rant du jour from the Golan. And now, lest I be accused of being too deadly serious while on my summer vacation, here’s another pic of me and Cantor Howard for your viewing pleasure. The obligatory Dead Sea “mud-shot” taken last Monday:

picture-010.jpg

Land and Water, Then and Now

dead-sea.jpgFrom the week’s Torah portion, Parashat Eikev:

For the land that you are about to inherit and possess is not like the land of Egypt from which you have come. There the grain you sowed had to be watered by your own labors, like vegetable garden; but the land you are about to cross into and possess, a land of hills and valleys, soaks up its water from the rains of heaven. (Deuteronomy 11:10-11)

From the JTA, September 2, 2005:

It took the Dead Sea to breathe some life into Arab-Israeli cooperation.

On Sunday, at the U.N. World Summit on Sustainable Development, four Israeli and Jordanian government ministers presented a collaborative venture to save the Dead Sea, which has been shrinking at an alarming rate.

Under the plan, a canal would be dug to divert water from the Red Sea to the Dead Sea.

Funding for the plan, which could cost up to $1 billion, would come from the World Bank. Construction is expected to begin within 12 to 18 months and take at least five years.

An additional $3 billion to $4 billion — expected to come from private sources — would be needed to construct desalination plants, which would provide water to Israel, Jordan and the Palestinians.

Hassam Nassar, Jordan’s minister of water and irrigation, said the level of the Dead Sea was dropping by over three feet a year. It already is the lowest point on the surface of the earth, 1,350 feet below sea level.

Stabilizing the level of the water would help maintain the heritage value of the Dead Sea, which has archaeological, tourism, ecological, historical and cultural value for the region and for all three of its major religions.

In recent years, U.N. conferences often have become playgrounds for Israel-bashers. But with international support required for the Dead Sea project, both Israel and Jordan believed the summit was the correct venue to inform the international community of the plan.

Initial investigations by a special binational technical task team have so far not shown any real environmental obstacles to the plan. The $10 million investigation will take around 18 months to complete.

The “Red-Dead” project faced fewer ecological difficulties than the previously proposed “Med-Dead” concept of bringing water from the Mediterranean Sea.

“Maybe this time the Dead Sea will bring life and peace to the region,” Israeli Environment Minister Tzachi Hanegbi said.

Though Israel and Jordan are officially at peace, public announcements involving ministers from the two countries are rare.

But Bassem Awadallah, Jordan’s planning minister, said this was an environmental issue, not a political one.

“We are trying to keep the project out of politics. The project will save us all, Palestinians, Israelis and Jordanians from an ecological disaster,” he said.

Awadallah added that this was an urgent environmental problem that could not wait for peace between Israel and the Palestinians.

“We have to start now,” he said. “This is a natural disaster in the making and we will be criminals if we ignore it and watch the Dead Sea disappearing before our eyes.”

(Click here for a more current report on the status of the Dead Sea-Red Sea Canal Project.)