Settlements Increase While the Door Closes

At a Jerusalem press conference in with Condoleeza Rice and Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni yesterday, the very first questioner cut right to the chase:

The organization Peace Now reported today that Israeli settlement activity has nearly doubled in the past year, Foreign Minister Livni, how do you reconcile that with your stated goal of trying to reach a peace agreement?  And, Secretary Rice, how – what affect does this have? Does this harm or undermine the process?

I won’t bother to reprint Livni and Rice’s answers – feel free to read the transcript yourself. Suffice to say the question seemed to catch Livni flatfooted and Rice offered a tepid reiteration of the US opposition to Israel’s increased settlement activity.

What is there really to say except thank goodness for Peace Now, who has been indefatigably and faithfully documenting the growth of the settlements throughout East Jerusalem and the West Bank?  I encourage you to read the new Peace Now report carefully – it paints a profoundly troubling portrait of a dramatic settlement increase since the Annapolis peace process began.  Among its main findings:

– Over 1000 new buildings are being constructed in the settlements, in which approximately 2,600 housing units. Approximately 55% of the new structures are located to the east of the constructed Separation Barrier.

– According to figures from the Central Bureau of Statistics, construction in the settlements has increased by a factor of 1.8 by comparison to the same period last year. The Housing Ministry initiated 433 new housing units during the period of January – May 2008, compared to just 240 housing units during the period January – May 2007.

– 125 new structures have been added to the outposts, including 30 permanent houses. The number of tenders for construction in the settlements has increased by 550%. 417 housing units, compared to just 65 in 2007. The number of tenders in East Jerusalem has increased by a factor of 38 (1,761 housing units compared to 46 in 2007).

Most alarming, the report concludes:

In recent years the trend has accelerated to eliminate the Green Line through intensive construction intended to create a territorial connection between the blocks of settlements and isolated settlements in the heart of the West Bank.

Anyone who seeks a true and lasting peace between Israel and Palestine should be deeply alarmed by findings such as these. Whether Israel’s leaders are unwilling or simply unable to stem the settlements is moot at this point. The bottom line: the door is closing fast on a two-state solution.  (Indeed, when a Palestinian moderate such as Sari Nusseibeh publically inclines toward a one-state solution, I’d say the peace process is approaching a point of reckoning.)

One more piece of assigned reading then I’ll sign off. Brit Tzedek v’Shalom is circulating a Rabbinic High Holiday letter to Obama and McCain, urging the next President to make resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict a top priority of the incoming administration. It’s already been signed by over 150 rabbis, cantors and rabbinical students – encourage yours to sign on…

3 Replies to “Settlements Increase While the Door Closes”

  1. Brant,
    You are taking a principled position. Too often Jews, and their supporters, talk about the Palestinian not offering a real partner to peace. How can that be said when such flagrant actions are undermining what should be negotiating points. For all the protests to the contrary, the creation of these facts on the ground put a lie to the idea of the Israelis being a true partner to peace.

    Go forward in strength.

  2. Thank you, Brant, for bringing this issue to people’s attention. I’ve been to the West Bank twice since 2005 and the dramatic increase in settlements is overwhelming, completely obvious to even a casual observer and glaringly so to Palestinians living there. When I visited three years ago Palestinians were talking about their dream of an independent state. This July, I heard no one speak of that as a possibility and one was viewed as a complete fool if you asked about it. What are the alternatives? Can we find a way to share the land as equals?

  3. Brant,
    This is an important topic, and your recognition of it should be praised; both sides could benefit from more self-reflection, instead of the endless finger-pointing.
    That being said, it is important to remember that the settlements are a very fragile issue. The current parliamentary majority includes the Shas party, a powerful pro-settlement group. To attribute the loss of hope in the West Bank directly to the increased settlements, as Lynn Pollack does, is dangerous. There has been significant failure in the Palestinian leadership in the last three years that has certainly contributed at least as much, if not more, to the decimation of the Palestinians’ hope.
    If both sides were to recognize that concessions must be made, we may be able to reach an agreement.

    Shana Tova.

    Joey Sager

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s