In the meantime, there’s been a great deal of worthwhile responses to her challenge throughout the blogosphere and in the print media. Among the best is this recent piece from Sports Illustrated by my all-time favorite sportswriter, Rick Reilly. This kind of advocacy from such a major publication is HUGE, quite frankly.
Mia’s Olympic Mettle
Rick Reilly
Sports Illustrated, May 14, 2007
The first hero of the 2008 Beijing Olympics stands 5’4″ and weighs 108 pounds, including purse. She’s 62, runs the 100 meter dash in about a day and has 14 kids. She speaks in a weak voice, yet her words are shaking the world.
She’s Mia Farrow. Remember? Rosemary’s Baby? UNICEF goodwill ambassador?
On TV and in newspapers, Farrow has been pressuring China to face up to its role in the genocide being carried out by Arab militia groups in the Darfur region of Sudan, where an estimated 400,000 non-Arab Africans have been slaughtered and another two million have been made refugees. “These are the Genocide Olympics,” says Farrow, who has made two trips to Darfur and three to camps in neighboring countries. “China is funding the first genocide of the third millennium.”
According to the Council on Foreign Relations, China buys about two thirds of Sudan’s oil. The Sudanese government then uses the majority of its oil profits to buy weapons and aircraft, most of them made by China. The arms are turned over to a proxy militia, the Janjaweed, which burns, dismembers, rapes and kills Darfur’s villagers and destroys their land. China maintains that it doesn’t interfere with the internal politics of other nations, and using that policy it has blocked U.N. efforts to send a peacekeeping force into Darfur by insisting that Sudan first invite the troops in.
Farrow has also tried to get at China by taking on Steven Spielberg. The King Kong of directors is one of the Beijing Games’ “artistic advisers,” helping to orchestrate the opening and closing ceremonies. But how can a man who decried one holocaust in his finest film Schindler’s List be in bed with a country that is helping to bankroll another?
Spielberg could “go down in history as the Leni Riefenstahl of the Beijing Games,” Farrow wrote in a Wall Street Journal op-ed piece in late March, referring to the German woman whose film about the 1936 Berlin Olympics is viewed as Nazi propaganda.
Spielberg’s face must’ve fallen like E.T.’s when he read that. He immediately wrote a letter to China’s president, Hu Jintao, asking him to intercede in Darfur. China sent a high-ranking official to Khartoum to try to persuade the Sudanese government to allow in the 20,000 peacekeeping troops who stand ready to enter Darfur under U.N. Security Council Resolution 1706. That envoy returned to pronounce the situation “improving.”
“That visit meant nothing,” says Eric Reeves, a Smith College professor who is a leading Darfur activist. “He toured the camps with the most food and the most control. This was airbrushed genocide.”
Spielberg declined to comment to SI, but his spokesman, Marvin Levy, said, “This is a step-by-step process. We think there was some movement. We’ll see.”
“At what cost?” asks Farrow. “Ten thousand a month are dying, minimum.” Forget Private Ryan, Mr. Spielberg. Save Darfur!
Before the world arrives, Beijing has instituted a campaign to get residents to stop spitting and rushing into buses and trains without waiting for people to get off. But if the Chinese have to clean up for company, why shouldn’t their government?
The last thing anybody wants, including Farrow, is an Olympic boycott. It would make China a sympathetic victim, and innocent athletes would suffer. But China’s feet must be held to the fire, even if that fire is an Olympic torch. And activists are lighting the flame any way they can by:
Organizing an alternative torch relay, which will go from Darfur to Hong Kong, linking the bloodshed to its biggest banker (www.dreamfordarfur.org).
Insisting Olympic sponsors (go to www.miafarrow.org for a list) lean on China to pressure Sudan to let the peacekeepers in.
Writing protest letters to the Chinese government, such as the one just signed by 12 Cleveland Cavaliers.
Convincing athletes, if nothing changes by 2008, to compete in Beijing wearing Dream for Darfur’s Chinese-character tattoo (translation: China, please) on the inside of their wrists, a reminder of the way Germany’s holocaust victims were tattooed.
“I wish I could take China’s president to Darfur, take Mr. Spielberg there, every Olympic official,” Farrow says. “Because once you’ve seen it, you can’t turn away.”
Do you remember Tiananmen Square, 1989? The guy who stood all alone, in front of a column of tanks? Today, that lone figure is tiny Mia Farrow.
Who will line up behind her?
Here’s my vote for the headline of the year: “Man Clad in Underwear Pins Leopard.”
“A single man was created to teach you that one who destroys a single soul, it is as if he has destroyed an entire world…” (Mishnah Sanhedrin 4:5)
As the agony occurring in and around Gaza increases, the most helpful analysis I’ve yet read is “Who’s at Fault?” by Dr. Gershon Baskin of the Israel-Palestine Center for Research and Information. (I’ll spill the beans: there’s enough blame to go around…)
As we begin Parashat Bamidbar – the first portion in the book of Numbers – we read:
Face to Face
One of the most notable aspects of the three-part Birkat Cohenim (Priestly Benediction) is its use of the metaphor of “God’s face.” The final two blessings utilize this image in two different ways: in the second blessing, the “light” of God’s countenance bestows acceptance or grace (in Hebrew, chen); in the third and final blessing, the “turning” of God’s face expresses Shalom – peace, wholeness, fulfillment.
The metaphor of God’s face is used throughout the Bible, often to convey the powerful and immediate experience of the Divine Presence. For instance, Moses’ unique relationship with God is driven home when we read that “God singled him out face to face” (Deuteronomy 34:10). On the other hand, the concept of hester panim (the hiding of God’s face) is often invoked to convey divine anger and punishment. (See Deuteronomy 31:18). This metaphor is also used in a powerful and poignant way during the reconciliation of estranged twin brothers Jacob and Esau. Upon their reunion, Jacob says to his older brother:
This use of the metaphor suggests that Godliness is particularly manifest in the act of conflict resolution – when former enemies find the wherewithal to “turn their faces” to one another. In this regard, we might well view the Birkat Cohenim not merely as a blessing of well-being but as a spiritual imperative. How will God’s face shine upon or turn to greet us? When we turn our faces to one another in acceptance and peace.
Postscript: This imperative is particularly endangered in a world where extremism too often eclipses the faces of moderation on all sides. The OneVoice Movement in Israel/Palestine is one inspiring example of an effort to empower the forces of acceptance and peace on a widespread, grassroots level. By their own description:
Want to be inspired? Visit their website and/or view their video below:
→ 1 Comment
Posted in Coexistence, Israel, Judaism, Palestine, Peace, Politics, Religion, Terrorism, Torah Commentary